
|
SITE MENU Welcome to DSI For Patients For Industry For Doctors Research Network Oaths and Pledges Medical Humor H*I*P*A*A Links Literature Review Internet Resources About Us Employment Other Sites Site Map |
Medical Research Exam Sample Questions
109) Which of the following studies meets the definition of research with human subjects?
a) A study in three 4th grade classrooms about the relationship between the time of day reading is taught and improved reading comprehension.
b) The collection of data about the physical dimensions of school playgrounds by a playground designer hired by the superintendent of schools. c) An analysis of aggregate data comparing statewide high school graduation rates, provided by the State Department of Public Instruction, with county tax bases. d) None of the above
110) According to the federal regulations for protecting research subjects, a human subject is a living individual about whom an investigator obtains:
a) Data through an intervention.
b) Identifiable private information. c) Data through interaction. d) All of the above
111) An investigator wishes to study lifestyle and diet influences on the risk of developing a specific cancer. The investigator chooses a case-control design with paired lifestyle interviews and a few blood and urine tests and assigns a study manager to identify patients with the diagnosis from the pathology logbook that lists names. The study manager would then ask each patient’s primary physician for permission to contact the patient. Which of the following is required before the investigator begins the study?
a) Permission from the Oncology Department.
b) Hospital accreditation. c) A Clinical Trials Office. d) IRB review and approval.
112) An investigator fails to inform subjects about the foreseeable risks in a study of a new drug. Which of the following best describes the ethical principle violated?
a) Access to research.
b) Research Integrity. c) Respect for persons. d) Justice.
113) Which of the following studies led to the establishment of the National Research Act and ultimately the Belmont Report and Federal regulations for human subject protection?
a) Obedience to authority study (Milgram study).
b) Nazi medical experiments. c) Jewish chronic disease study. d) The Public Health Service syphilis study.
114) Which of the following lists the three principles discussed in the Belmont Report?
a) Privacy, Confidentiality, Equitable selection of subjects.
b) Informed Consent, Institutional Assurance, Researcher responsibility. c) Respect for Persons, Beneficence, Justice. d) IRB review, federal regulations, Declaration of Helsinki.
115) In what way did the Beecher article impact research in the United States?
a) It resulted in the creation of the IRB.
b) It prompted congress to create an ad hoc panel to provide oversight for human research. c) It heightened awareness of problems with unethical research. d) It reinterpreted the Belmont principles with a focus on therapeutic medical research.
116) A student working on his dissertation plans on interviewing 15 principals in neighboring high schools. The student plans to collect data about the personal experiences the principals have had with disruptive students and what types of disciplinary actions were taken. Identifiers will be collected. This study would be categorized as which type of review?
a) Expedited Review
b) Exempt Review c) Full Board Review d) Not Human Subjects
117) How can faculty researchers avoid coercion of student subjects?
a) Provide extra credit to those who participate
b) Conduct research for less than 10 minutes during class so as to not take up much class time c) Avoid using their own students in their research d) Offer more monetary compensation
118) A student is conducting a research project that involves using a survey. The survey asks subjects about their political affiliation and their favorite politicians. No identifiable information will be collected. This study would be categorized as which type of review?
a) Expedited Review
b) Exempt Review c) Full Board Review d) Not Human Subjects
119) Which type of IRB review does not require an IRB approval but does require a determination by the IRB or an IRB designee?
a) Full Board
b) Expedited c) Exempt d) All of the above
120) A Masters degree candidate needs to conduct a research project for her Masters thesis. She is interested in the types of junk food available to the public. She plans on going to the local convenience stores and asking the owners what types of junk food they normally stock and what are their biggest sellers. Identifiers will not be collected. This study would be categorized as which type of review?
a) Expedited Review
b) Exempt Review c) Not Human Subjects d) Full Board Review
121) Which of the following elements must be included in an informed consent?
a) Procedures/methods involved in the research
b) The purpose of the research c) All foreseeable risks and discomforts d) All of the above
122) The history of ethical regulations in human subjects research began with the
a) Declaration of Helsinki
b) Common Rule c) Nuremburg Code d) Belmont Report
123) The Belmont Report describes all of the following EXCEPT:
a) The Belmont Report describes the concept of "Respect for Person".
b) The Belmont Report defines and delineates the differences between "Practice" and "Research". c) The Belmont Report indicates that it is necessary to rigorously avoid conflicts of interest as an example of the Principle of Justice. d) The Belmont Report describes the need to carefully consider how research discoveries and risks will be fairly distributed in the society.
124) Which of the following is an example of how the Principle of Beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects?
a) Insuring that the selection of subjects includes people from all segments of the population.
b) Insuring that confidentiality is maintained. c) Determining that the study has a maximally favorable risk vs. benefit ratio. d) Providing detailed information about the study and obtaining the subject's consent to participate.
125) Which of the following lists the three principles discussed in the Belmont Report?
a) Informed Consent, Institutional Assurance, Researcher responsibility.
b) IRB review, Federal regulations, Declaration of Helsinki. c) Privacy, Confidentiality, Equitable selection of subjects. d) Respect for Person, Beneficence, Justice.
126) Which of the following statements correctly describes covert observation?
a) It always constitutes a violation of the subjects' privacy.
b) Subjects must be told after the observation. c) It may place subjects at risk of harm. d) Prior permission is secured from the individuals being observed.
127) Which of the following statements about Certificates of Confidentiality is true?
a) They allow investigators to refuse to disclose information about individual research subjects.
b) Their use is limited to civil procedings in the state in which the research took place. c) They can be used to protect information about the researchers, including income. d) Their use is limited to research funded by the NIH.
128) A researcher conducts a survey of people who were sexually abused as children, recruited through an advertisement in the local paper. The confidentiality agreement states that the signed consent forms will be kept under lock and key, but the researcher accidentally leaves the file containing the signed forms at a cyber cafe. The owner of the cafe looks through the file so he can return it to the right patron. The researcher has:
a) Breached the confidentiality agreement and violated the subjects' privacy.
b) Violated the subjects' privacy only. c) Breached the confidentiality agreement only. d) None of the above
129) According to the federal regulations, private information:
a) Includes information about behavior, but not existing records.
b) Includes information about behavior and existing records. c) Excludes any behaviors that can be observed. d) Can be identified in accordance with universal standards.
130) Whose expectations determine whether a proposed research setting is considered public or private?
a) The IRB's only.
b) University legal counsel. c) The researcher's only. d) The individuals whose behavior is being observed and recorded.
131) A graduate student wants to examine the effect of print media versus televised media on individuals' position on several social issues. Her advisor’s neighbor is the superintendent of a local work release facility and will allow the graduate student access to the prison population to help her accrue subjects. She will also recruit subjects on her campus. The subjects will be asked for 15 minutes of their time. The risks appear to be no more than minimal. The IRB would most likely:
a) Not approve this project because the prisoners are merely a population of convenience.
b) Approve this project since the risk is minimal. c) Approve this project since the superintendent is the ultimate authority on what happens in his facility. d) Approve this project but submit it for federal review.
132) Which of the following statements about prison research is true?
a) Participation in research can be considered during parole hearings.
b) Researchers cannot pay prisoners. c) The risks involved in the research may be higher than those that would be accepted by non-prisoners. d) Researchers may study the effects of privilege upgrades if they are awarded by the prison.
133) An investigator is examining the quality of life for prisoners who are HIV positive. The researcher plans to use standardized survey instruments followed by an interview. Neither the survey nor the interview questions are probing about the offender’s past life but maintain a focus on current life situation in the prison. The IRB must ensure that:
a) A medical doctor serves as co-investigator.
b) The investigator is aware of the potential risks of interviewing inside a prison. c) The survey instrument is standardized. d) Confidentiality of the prisoners' health status is maintained.
134) An investigator is examining the relationship between family contact/visitation and depression in mothers recently admitted to a state prison. The researcher will use the data to develop support programs for prison mothers. The sample will be limited to first offenders with children under the age of five years. Research subjects will be given a basket of toys to use at their children's first visit that the children can then take home. In assessing this proposal, the IRB needs to determine that the toys are:
a) Educational.
b) Age appropriate. c) Of high quality. d) Not an excessive inducement.
135) Parental permission for children to participate may be waived if:
a) The children are homeless.
b) The children can read at a twelfth grade level. c) The children are emancipated minors. d) The parents are illiterate.
136) Which of the following methods of subject recruitment presents the LEAST potential for coercion?
a) Recruiting middle school students in the presence of their parents
b) Recruiting adolescents in the presence of their peers c) Recruiting college freshmen on their first day on campus d) Recruiting children to learn about ecology at a summer recreation program
137) Which of the following methods of subject recruitment presents the LEAST potential for coercion?
a) Recruiting middle school students in the presence of their parents
b) Recruiting adolescents in the presence of their peers c) Recruiting college freshmen on their first day on campus d) Recruiting children to learn about ecology at a summer recreation program
138) According to federal regulations, when can research with children be exempt?
a) When children are 12 or older
b) It can never be exempt c) When parents request an exemption d) When it falls into an eligible category of research activity
139) The absence of child dissent may be considered assent to participate in research.
a) True
b) False
140) A study of the effects of divorce on children proposes annual interviews of children, aged seven through sixteen, and their parents. Which of the following statements best describes the consent requirements for this study?
a) Parental permission is sufficient to enter a child into the study for children between the ages 7 and 14.
b) Consent must be obtained and documented for all participants using the same IRB consent form. c) If the teacher thinks it would be helpful for a child to talk about divorce, the child may be enrolled without parental permission. d) The assent process for the children should vary depending upon their age and maturity.
141) As part of its commitment to evidence-based medicine, Medical School Alpha wants to ensure that its students and residents will be able to understand and evaluate the results of future research. Accordingly, the school requires each student and resident to develop a research protocol, collect data on living and deceased patients, analyze the data and report the results. Many of these studies will involve medical record or chart reviews, although patients have never explicitly agreed to have their medical records used in this way. Does the Final Privacy Rule make these chart reviews improper without further IRB or Privacy Board action? Consider each of the answers and choose the most appropriate one.
a) No, because the patient information cannot be traced to anyone and therefore is “de-identified” as required by the Final Privacy Rule.
b) No. Although the patients never authorized this use of their health care data, a waiver of consent for chart review approved by the IRB would be sufficient for the research to proceed. c) No, because patients will be given a notice of privacy practice when admitted to the Medical School Alpha which clarifies information can be collected for future use in research. d) Yes, the IRB or Privacy Board must grant a HIPAA compliant waiver of authorization for this undertaking because the research is not authorized by a patient, not a review preparatory to research and does not solely use decedent information.
142) A consent for research under the Common Rule is the same as an authorization for disclosure of PHI under the Final Privacy Rule.
a) True
b) False
143) Vulnerable persons are those who are less able to defend themselves than other persons in a given situation. The Common Rule (45 CFR 46) has specific requirements for the following vulnerable populations, except:
a) Pregnant Women
b) Prisoners c) Children d) Workers
144) When a research project includes the collection of biological samples, all planned future uses of the samples, identifiers, and the data obtained from the samples, must be fully explained to the research subject.
a) True
b) False
145) Researcher access to confidential records adds to the vulnerability of workers who participate in workplace studies. Inappropriate release of identifiable private information could adversely affect a worker's retention of a job, insurance or other employment related benefits. To avoid or minimize these risks, the study design must include adequate safeguards to protect the confidentiality of the information collected. A plan for the proper management of study data and records should clearly define:
a) Who will have access to the data.
b) If personal identifiers will be retained and used in the data analysis. c) If the study results, if any, will be included in the employee's personnel records. d) How the data will be collected and secured. e) All of the above
146) When workers are asked to participate in a research study, vulnerabilities related to the subjects employment may include:
a) Unions may encourage employees to participate with the expectation that "entitlements" may follow from study results.
b) Employees may experience pressure from management to participate in the study because the employer perceives the study to be advantageous to the organization. c) The employer may encourage or deny participation of workers. d) The research study's finding could affect an employee's pay, benefits or promotion potential. e) All of the above
147) The most important ethical concerns relating to conflicts of interest in research are (choose one answer):
a) maintaining a supply of volunteers for research studies
b) ensuring the soundness of science and the protection of human subjects c) protecting proprietary information and fidelity to contracts with sponsors d) All of the above
148) Current Public Health Service regulations require investigators to disclose details regarding financial conflicts of interest to:
a) subjects/participants
b) funding agency or sponsor c) Institutional Review Boards d) designated institutional officials e) All of the above
149) The Case: A Full IRB Committee meeting is convened on October 18, 2006. The IRB Committee roster consists of 15 members. However, only 8 members are in attendance for today's meeting. One agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning disabled child. The inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. The protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. One of the IRB members, Susan, is Principal Investigator for the study and receives a portion of her salary from the supporting grant. The Question: There were a number of problems with the protocol, but the IRB eventually approved the protocol at a duly constituted Full IRB Committee Review on February 15, 2007. Accrual and treatment are planned to continue through 2008. Which of the following best describes IRB continuation review requirements for this study?
a) The continuation review may be conducted by a voting member of the IRB, delegated by the Chair.
b) The continuation review can be conducted by the IRB Chair only. c) The IRB may extend the deadline for continuing review by 30 days. After that, the research must cease. d) The research must be re-reviewed by the Full IRB Committee on or before February 14, 2008.
150) The Case: A Full IRB Committee meeting is convened on October 18, 2006. The IRB Committee roster consists of 15 members. However, only 8 members are in attendance for today's meeting. One agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning disabled child. The inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. The protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. One of the IRB members, Susan, is Principal Investigator for the study and receives a portion of her salary from the supporting grant. The Question: The proposal does not include adequate information regarding the potential risks to the minor subjects in the research study, but is otherwise approvable. The committee considers these risks to be more than minimal risk to the minor child. Which of the following best describes how the IRB should proceed?
a) Table the protocol and ask the investigator to provide the needed information for review by the full board at the next convened meeting.
b) Approve the proposal, but ask the investigator to write a letter to the IRB describing risks to the minor subjects and that might be appended to the IRB records. c) Approve the proposal if the IRB can deduce what the risks would be. d) Conditionally approve the research, pending receipt of additional information from the investigator, and review by the IRB staff.
151) The Case: A Full IRB Committee meeting is convened on October 18, 2006. The IRB Committee roster consists of 15 members. However, only 8 members are in attendance for today's meeting. One agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning disabled child. The Question: Which of the following IRB members must be present during the IRB's discussion and vote on a proposal?
a) The Principal Investigator for the research proposal under deliberation.
b) A member who is unaffiliated with the institution. c) The non-scientist member. d) A social worker.
152) The Case: A Full IRB Committee meeting is convened on October 18, 2006. The IRB Committee roster consists of 15 members. However, only 8 members are in attendance for today's meeting. One agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning disabled child. The inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. The protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. One of the IRB members, Susan, is Principal Investigator for the study and receives a portion of her salary from the supporting grant. The Question: Susan, the principal investigator, must recuse herself from the room during both the final deliberations and the vote on the study. Which of the following best describes the committee's action after Susan leaves the IRB meeting?
a) Trust that the study is ethical because Susan is a member of the Committee and continue with the final deliberations and vote.
b) Use an expert in child development as a consulting reviewer could help answer questions in Susan's absence. c) Defer the proposal to the next meeting because of a loss if quorum. d) Continue with review, discussion and vote because the minutes will note that Susan abstained from the vote.
153) The Case: A Full IRB Committee meeting is convened on October 18, 2006. The IRB Committee roster consists of 15 members. However, only 8 members are in attendance for today's meeting. One agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning disabled child. The inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. The protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. The Question: The Committee determined that the mother's required task may upset the child. Which of the following actions best describes the most appropriate steps for the committee to take?
a) Recommend an alternate age range of disabled children between ages 7-11.
b) Check to make sure that there is an assent form for the child. c) Evaluate the study risks and study benefits and to determine if appropriate procedures are in place to minimize study risk to participants. d) Reject the study as too risky.
154) The Case: A Full IRB Committee meeting is convened on October 18, 2006. The IRB Committee roster consists of 15 members. However, only 8 members are in attendance for today's meeting. One agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning disabled child. The inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. The protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. One of the IRB members, Susan, is Principal Investigator for the study and receives a portion of her salary from the supporting grant. The Question: What is the minimum number of people required to conduct business at this Full IRB Committee meeting?
a) 10
b) 7 c) 9 d) 8
155) Which of the following lists the three principles discussed in the Belmont Report?
a) Respect for Person, Beneficence, Justice.
b) Informed Consent, Institutional Assurance, Researcher responsibility. c) Privacy, Confidentiality, Equitable selection of subjects. d) IRB review, federal regulations, Declaration of Helsinki.
156) In what way did the Beecher article impact research in the United States?
a) It prompted congress to create an ad hoc panel to provide oversight for human research.
b) It resulted in the creation of the IRB. c) It heightened awareness of problems with unethical research. d) It reinterpreted the Belmont principles with a focus on therapeutic medical research.
157) An investigator fails to inform subjects about the foreseeable risks in a study of a new drug. Which of the following best describes the ethical principle violated?
a) Access to research
b) Research Integrity c) Respect for persons d) Justice
158) An investigator wishes to study lifestyle and diet influences on the risk of developing a specific cancer. The investigator chooses a case-control design with paired lifestyle interviews and a few blood and urine tests and assigns a study manager to identify patients with the diagnosis from the pathology logbook that lists names. The study manager would then ask each patient's primary physician for permission to contact the patient. Which of the following is required before the investigator begins the study?
a) Permission from the Oncology Department
b) Hospital accreditation c) A Clinical Trials Office d) IRB review and approval
159) Which of the following studies led to the establishment of the National Research Act and ultimately the Belmont Report and Federal regulations for human subject protection?
a) The Public Health Service (PHS) syphilis study
b) Nazi medical experiments c) Jewish chronic disease study d) Obedience to authority study (Milgram study)
160) IRB continuing review of an approved protocol must:
a) Must occur only when the level of risk changes.
b) Occur at least annually. c) Must be conducted by a convened IRB. d) Include copies of all signed consent forms.
161) A subject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. How should the investigator proceed after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence?
a) Report the adverse drug experience to the IRB only if there are several other occurrences.
b) Report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. c) Do not report the adverse drug experience to the IRB since it is a common adverse experience. d) Report the adverse drug experience immediately to the IRB using the forms or the mechanism provided by the institution.
162) How long is an investigator required to keep consent documents, IRB correspondence, and research records?
a) As long as the investigator is at that institution
b) Until the IRB gives permission for them to be destroyed c) Until the study is closed d) For a minimum of three years after completion of the study
163) Amendments involving changes to IRB approved protocols do NOT need prior IRB approval if:
a) They are eligible for review using expedited procedures.
b) They only involve changes to the consent form. c) The changes must be immediately implemented for the health and well being of the subject. d) The investigator keeps careful records of all changes and includes them in the final report.
164) According to federal regulations, which of the following best describes when expedited review of a new, proposed study may be used by the IRB?
a) The study includes only research subjects that are healthy volunteers.
b) The study is required for a student research project. c) The study does not require informed consent or survey instruments. d) The study involves no more than minimal risk and meets one of the allowable categories of expedited review specified in federal regulations.
165) A 46-year-old man is currently enrolled in a Phase 1. study of a drug for severe diabetic neuropathy. While the study is on going, a new drug becomes commercially available that may have equal or greater benefit to the subject. The investigator should do which of the following?
a) Do not tell the subject about the new drug since physicians have the right to try out new treatments with their patients
b) Give the subject comprehensive information about the new drug, including its side effects. Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and the commercially available drug and then allow thes subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug. c) Tell the subject about the new drug but discourage him from switching treatments until the study is completed d) Withhold this new information to avoid confusing the subject with other treatment options or alternatives
166) An elderly man recently diagnosed with lung cancer is screened for a clinical trial using a new investigational drug. The investigator has carefully explained all of the required information about the study to the subject and the subject’s daughter. The subject demonstrates his understanding and willingness to participate, but is not able to sign the informed consent document due to paralysis from a swimming accident years before. The subject’s wife is his legally authorized representative, but she is out of town on a business trip. Which of the following is the most appropriate action to take for the investigator?
a) The investigator can go ahead and treat the man without a signed consent since he verbally agreed to participate.
b) Send a copy of the informed consent via facsimile to the subject’s wife. After she has had the opportunity to speak to the investigator and her husband, she can sign the informed consent and fax it back. c) Exclude the man from the study. d) Request the IRB waive the requirement for a signed informed consent.
167) An investigator is confronted with a life-threatening situation that necessitates using a test article in a human subject who is unable to provide informed consent and there is no time to obtain consent for the individual's legal representative. Under the FDA regulations for using test articles, which of the following describes the best course of action for the investigator:
a) Use the test article without obtaining consent from the subject or the legal representative then notify the IRB.
b) The investigator and another physician agree that the situation necessitates the use of the test article. An exception or waiver for informed consent can be made under these circumstances. The IRB will be notified later. c) Submit a research protocol to the IRB and justify an expedited review approval of the consent document so test article can be used immediately. d) Do not use the test article until either the subject or the subject's legal representative can give consent.
168) A general requirement for the informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. Exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. Which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language?
a) Your participation in this research is voluntary. If you choose not to participate, or change you mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with your doctor or your right to health care or other services that you may be eligible for.
b) In the event of any injury you may have related to this research, you will be given medical treatment. c) The investigator may stop you from participating in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your condition worse. If you become ill during the research, you may have to drop out. d) You must provide blood samples that will be kept in a “bank” for future research. Once you have provided these blood samples, you cannot change your mind about being in the research and have the sample removed from the “bank”.
169) After beginning a records-based research project, the researcher determines that the individuals whose data is being collected need to be contacted for updated substance abuse information. This will require a change to the protocol. What level of review by the IRB is most likely?
a) Expedited
b) None c) Review for exemption d) Review by the convened IRB (Full Review)
170) An investigator is recording nonidentifiable information from records to study the frequency of "handedness" (left hand versus right hand) in a given population. What level of review is most appropriate?
a) Expedited review by a designated IRB member
b) None c) Review by a convened quorum of the IRB d) Determination of exemption
171) Under which of the following conditions is it appropriate to re-contact the individuals who provided biological specimens?
a) Subjects received financial compensation for participation in the study
b) Biological specimens need to be replenished c) Discovery of related clinical information requires contacting subjects for follow-up d) Original signed consent documents include provisions for recontacting subjects
172) When conducting research that involves collecting biological specimens for genetic testing, which of the following issues is the most important for the IRB to consider?
a) Long term financial impact of results
b) Ownership of biological specimens c) Need for publication of results d) Effects of findings on other family members
173) An investigator planning to study behavioral changes during alcohol intoxication will pay subjects $600 for 6 hours of testing that includes drinking a moderate level of alcohol and completing several written questionnaires. He plans to recruit college students taking his courses, as well as economically disadvantaged and homeless people. Which of the following is the most important for the investigator to address before submitting the protocol to the IRB?
a) Forms of advertising for subject recruitment
b) Potential undue influence or coercion of subjects c) Method of payment to subjects d) Literacy of homeless subjects
174) A group of elderly men, whose government disability benefits are the sole source of income, is approached to consider an experimental research study for their current colon cancer. The study involves more than minimal risk, but offers substantial financial incentives that are equal to two months of disability benefits. The IRB will be most concerned about the possibility of:
a) Inadequacy of research design
b) Inaccuracy of data c) Conflict of interest d) Undue influence of the subjects
175) A faculty member wants to measure the effectiveness of a new psychological assessment instrument before including it in his new textbook. He plans to conduct a pilot test by administering both the new instrument and an established instrument to about 10 people and then compare the results. Which of the following populations would be considered potentially most vulnerable to undue influence?
a) Members of his community organization who agree to take the tests
b) Senior faculty in his department c) Members of his professional society d) Students taking one of his courses
176) An investigator is recruiting subjects for a study of a new antidepressant drug. The investigator has targeted a population of patients who might clearly benefit, but who are also institutionalized for a variety of psychiatric conditions. The patients are in a controlled environment and it is believed there would be little problem recruiting subjects for the study. Which of the following issues of vulnerability should be of most concern to the IRB?
a) The patients may be on other medications
b) The patients have clinical depression, which is a difficult disease to treat c) The patients are probably illiterate d) The patients are institutionalized
177) The purpose of a federally supported research protocol is to examine the characteristics and effectiveness of ‘house arrest,’ a program where individuals are confined to their homes under continuous surveillance. Which of the following best describes the IRB’s duties when reviewing this research?
a) Even though this research involves individual subjects who would be considered prisoners and examines an alternative to incarceration, the IRB does not have any additional duties
b) Since this research is federally supported, the IRB does not have any duty to review this research c) Since this research does not involve individual subjects who would be considered prisoners, the IRB does not have any additional duties d) Since this research involves individual subjects who would be considered prisoners and examines an alternative to incarceration, the IRB should ensure that the additional requirements for prisoner research are met
178) When investigators plan to involve a prisoner population, which best describes the type of federally supported research that may be conducted?
a) research that has the promise of benefit to society in general, but not necessarily the prisoner population
b) research that involves only minimal risk to the prisoner population c) research that is relevant to prisoners and their conditions or situations d) research that the investigator proposes and gets funded
179) When reviewing federally supported research involving prisoners, an IRB must have at least the following member, in addition to the standard requirements for IRBs to ensure that the prisoners’ perspective is represented:
a) two members who are currently prison guards, wardens or parole officers
b) two members who are employed by the federal penal system c) one member who is a prisoner or prisoner representative d) one member who is a health care provider at the local hospital where prisoner may be treated
180) Due to past abuses, which of the following groups of potential research subjects has specific Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations to ensure additional protections when this population is being considered for research?
a) mentally disabled persons
b) the elderly c) men d) prisoners
181) An investigator proposes a study to determine the clinical relevance of a new assay technique to measure minimal residual disease (MRD) in adolescent (age 14-16) cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The study requires that two additional bone marrow aspirates be performed during the course of chemotherapy. The subject's chemotherapy will not be altered based on the results of the assay technique measures. However, future patients with cancer would benefit from improved interventions based on study findings. The IRB determined that the activity was a minor increase over minimal risk. Which of the following statements best describes the IRB approval requirements for involving adolescent cancer patients in the research study?
a) Assent is not required, however, one parent must give permission for the inclusion of the adolescent in this study.
b) Assent is not required, however, both parents must give permission for the inclusion of the adolescent child. c) Assent of the child only is required. d) Assent of the child and permission of both parents are required.
182) A federally funded research study involving children 8 to 12 years old involves collecting a single voided urine sample to assess the frequency of asymptomatic proteinuria (higher amounts of protein in the urine without any signs or symptoms of illness or infection). Your IRB has determined that assent of children age 8 and older is required for the study. A 10 year old does not assent to participate in the study described above. Which of the following procedures best describes the action to be taken by the investigator?
a) Consent one of the child’s parents instead.
b) Request the child reconsider assenting to the study. c) Honor the child’s decision. d) Consent both of the child’s parents instead.
183) A federally funded research study involving children 8 to 12 years old involves collecting a single voided urine sample to assess the frequency of asymptomatic proteinuria (higher amounts of protein in the urine without any signs or symptoms of illness or infection). According to 45 CFR 46, an IRB’s risk assessment would likely conclude that this study involves:
a) More than minimal risk with prospect of direct benefit to the child.
b) No more than minimal risk to the child. c) More than minimal risk with no prospect of direct benefit to the child. d) No risk to the child and no further IRB review is required.
184) Investigators wish to evaluate a new treatment for eclampsia (a life threatening condition in pregnant women) in women 30 – 50 years of age. The research is intended to directly benefit the pregnant woman who is otherwise healthy and competent. The investigator must obtain consent from whom?
a) The father of the fetus only.
b) The pregnant woman only. c) The pregnant woman and the father of the fetus. d) The pregnant woman and her legally authorized representative.
185) According to current NIH Guidelines, which of the following is adequate justification for exclusion of women from NIH funded research?
a) There is compelling evidence that inclusion would be inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects.
b) Inclusion of women would complicate analysis of the results and increase the costs of conducting the clinical trial. c) The woman is of child-bearing potential.
186) A research project is designed to evaluate a new experimental type of fetal surgery to correct diaphragmatic hernia in the fetus (a potentially life-threatening condition for the baby) prior to delivery. This research is directed toward the fetus as subject to meet the health needs of the fetus. The pregnant woman is otherwise healthy. The investigator must obtain consent from whom?
a) The pregnant woman only.
b) The pregnant woman and the father of the fetus. c) The father of the fetus only. d) The state court where the research is taking place.
187) The results from research have been known to produce harms to members of the sampled population who do not actually participate in the research study. An example of the type of research that could result in group harms is:
a) A hair restoration study in middle aged men.
b) A study designed to investigate genetic links between DNA samples found at a prehistoric central Asian archeological site and west coast American Indian tribes. c) A study to establish national reading standards in ten year old children. d) A study on the efficacy of a new birth control device in middle aged women.
188) Which of the following practices can be effective in minimizing group harms?
a) Planning disclosure of research results
b) Collaborative IRB review c) Ongoing consultation d) Community consultation e) All of the above
189) Which of the following studies has the LEAST potential to create group harm?
a) A genetic study to identify ancestral relationships between DNA obtained from a Cherokee Indian burial site and members of a Central Asian community.
b) Phase 3 clinical trial of a new anticancer agent in middle-aged women diagnosed with breast cancer. c) A study that surveys the perceptions of nurses and other health care workers about illegal drug use among cardiovascular surgeons in New York City. d) An anonymous survey of state high school teachers, athletic directors, and administrators that, among other things, asks for perceptions about the sexual preferences of their high school coaches.
190) An adult presents to a physician with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To date, no behavioral or drug interventions have proven useful. The physician has just read several reports about a drug that is approved and marketed for another indication, but has shown some benefit for ADHD. The physician wants to prescribe this drug, in the labeled marketed dose, for the individual patient. Which of the following would be the most appropriate course of action?
a) Submit a research protocol for IRB review and approval before treating the patient
b) Treat the patient with the drug based on physician’s best medical judgment c) Inform the patient that the drug cannot be prescribed d) Submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) application before treating the subject
191) 21 CFR Part 11 is intended to:
a) Prohibit the use of paper printouts of electronic records.
b) Provide specific standards for accuracy, reliability and consistent performance for hospital computer systems. c) Require use of electronic records for all drug research. d) Allow the use of electronic documents and signatures in the regulatory process for drugs and devices.
192) A sponsor proposes research to evaluate reengineering a commercially available pacemaker. It is hoped that the new pacemaker will pose fewer risks to individuals when compared to the current commercially available product. How should this device be classified?
a) Non-significant risk device
b) Significant risk device
193) An academic medical center is selecting a new database system for clinical research. The system needs to be "Part 11 compliant" in order to allow:
a) The database system to assign passwords.
b) The investigator to email subjects about the research. c) The medical center to replace the use of paper records with electronic records for its research. d) The use of paper records meeting FDA requirements.
194) An investigator proposes to study a marketed product sold to treat high blood pressure in individuals over age 12 using a liquid formulation for children under age 12. The drug sponsor hopes that the information from the research can be used to change the labeling for use of the drug in children. Which of the following is the investigator's most appropriate course of action?
a) Submit the research protocol to the IRB for review, but do not submit an IND application to the FDA since the drug is already approved and marketed for this indication
b) Submit an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) application to the FDA c) Submit the research protocol to the IRB for review and submit an IND application to the FDA before conducting the research d) Submit the research protocol to the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) for their review |